<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NPD Group Blog &#187; Commercial Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/category/commercial-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com</link>
	<description>The official blog of The NPD Group</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>More Evidence That PCs Remain Alive And Kicking</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2012/01/more-evidence-that-pcs-remain-alive-and-kicking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2012/01/more-evidence-that-pcs-remain-alive-and-kicking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Baker, Vice President, Industry Analysis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[commerical reseller]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[distributor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DMR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PC market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SMB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=1614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we enter 2012 and the thunder around tablets starts to increase we once again offer some results that show that the industry is not in as dire shape as some would believe. Today, NPD released the 2011 results from our sales tracking in the U.S. Reseller market (primarily DMRs) and through major broad line [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we enter 2012 and the thunder around tablets starts to increase we once again offer some results that show that the industry is not in as dire shape as some would believe. Today, NPD released the 2011 results from our sales tracking in the U.S. Reseller market (primarily DMRs) and through major broad line distributors - and surprise - the PC market performed pretty well.<br />
<span id="more-1614"></span><br />
The top line results in the release showed sales overall grew by 20 percent in units and 14percent in dollars, and that both notebooks and desktops increased by around 20 percent in unit volume in 2011. Of course all of this was on top of robust growth of 27 percent in 2010. Even during the recession of 2009, commercial channels couldn’t get PCs, especially notebooks, quick enough. Notebook volume jumped 37 percent in 2009 versus 2008.</p>
<p>Underneath these results are some truly interesting data points that show the health of the PC market through the channel. Notebook PCs saw an ASP of $764 in 2011, down just 5 percent from 2010 and actually up $4 from 2009. Desktop PCs also showed remarkably strong average selling prices, with 2011’s ASP of $638 down just under 3 percent from 2010, and up from $625 in 2009. Finding stable pricing anywhere in the IT hardware marketplace is a difficult task but in such a high-profile market as the PC market it is impressive. Equally impressive is the fact that despite these minimal price drops both desktops and notebooks have grown units in double digits in each of the last two years. The results has been the addition of 4.5m extra units, and approximately $2.2b, sold in 2011 versus the volumes posted in 2008 for all PCs.</p>
<p>Some of this is clearly the result of manufacturers making decisions to invest incrementally in the reseller and distribution channel as a way to reach the smaller businesses that have been growing their PC purchasing over the last year (as we mentioned in a <a href="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/12/smb%e2%80%99s-stalking-the-pc-market/" target="_self">blog</a> post a few weeks ago). This investment has been primarily the result of the premier access the channel has to the SMB marketplace. NPD’s SMB Technology Monitor showed that 32 percent of expected PC purchases from SMBs with 50-999 employees were expected to be made through VARs and DMRs, the primary resellers in these channels.</p>
<p>Finally, the brand competition between HP and Lenovo also provides a strong source of motivation and sales strength in the channel. Over the past four years approximately 60 percent of all sales through these channels have been to one of these two brands. And according to NPD’s SMB Technology Monitor that is likely to continue as these two brands have the highest sales conversion rates to SMBs with 50-999 employees of any of the channel centric PC companies. It seems that by the objective measure of sales that business demand and the channel volumes show that the PC market has delivered strong results over the past four years. Despite the trials and challenges of the last four years NPD’s commercial and distributor POS data show that PCs continue to outperform the industry in both sales growth and channel opportunity and the SMB monitor points to continued demand ahead in 2012.</p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1614" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2012/01/more-evidence-that-pcs-remain-alive-and-kicking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMB’s Stalking the PC Market</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/12/smb%e2%80%99s-stalking-the-pc-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/12/smb%e2%80%99s-stalking-the-pc-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Baker, Vice President, Industry Analysis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PC market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SMBs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While NPD’s press release today from our SMB Technology Monitor highlighted the increased interest firms with fewer than 1000 employees have in acquiring tablets for their employees, this by no means equates to the death of the PC market. The combination, however, of the length of time since the Windows 7 launch, the need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While NPD’s <a href="https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/pressreleases/pr_111229" target="_self">press release</a> today from our <a href="https://www.npd.com/lps/SMB_12_2011/PR_index.html" target="_self">SMB Technology Monitor</a> highlighted the increased interest firms with fewer than 1000 employees have in acquiring tablets for their employees, this by no means equates to the death of the PC market. The combination, however, of the length of time since the Windows 7 launch, the need to spend on higher cost infrastructure, and the increased spending on tablets has clearly put a crimp on PC spending intentions, especially among the largest firms.<br />
<span id="more-1523"></span><br />
In Q3, smaller firms (fewer than 50 employees) reported that they expect to increase spending on PCs (36 percent) over the next 12 months, while only 23 percent of the largest firms (501-999 employees) anticipated spending additional sums. Of course given the difference in spending the actual dollar intentions are quite dramatic. For the 501-999 segment the expected spend over the coming year was almost $75,000, which would equate to replacing around 10-15 percent of the company’s installed base and for the smallest company, their $3,400 would also fund an upgrade for about 10-15 percent of the firms PCs.</p>
<p>In general, however, spending expectations have really been mostly choices about spending more or spending the same, as very few firms are making the choice to spend less. Less than 20 percent of firms under 999 employees expect to spend less on PCs over that twelve month period. And only about one-in-10 large firms indicated that they anticipated spending nothing on PCs, while nearly half of the fewer than 50 employee companies expressed intent to cut all PC spending in the coming year.<br />
While the market speculation spins about the decline in the PC market it remains apparent that someone forgot to tell the customers. Spending continues on PCs, and on tablets, and few companies, even the smallest ones, are significantly reallocating their spending away from the personal computing needs of their employees. As we head into 2012 the SMB market continues to provide an important source of volume and dollars to PC market.</p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1523" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/12/smb%e2%80%99s-stalking-the-pc-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s Really Important In Apple’s iPad Announcement?</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/03/what%e2%80%99s-really-important-in-apple%e2%80%99s-ipad-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/03/what%e2%80%99s-really-important-in-apple%e2%80%99s-ipad-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Baker, Vice President, Industry Analysis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPad 2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the tech blogs and pundits are beating their drums about the potential launch of the iPad 2 on Wednesday.  Assuming that is what this event will introduce it would be much more worthwhile to concentrate on what is really important to the future of the iPad, and the tablet category in general. To-date all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;">All the tech blogs and pundits are beating their drums about the potential launch of the iPad 2 on Wednesday.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Assuming that is what this event will introduce it would be much more worthwhile to concentrate on what is really important to the future of the iPad, and the tablet category in general. To-date all we have heard are the typical pronouncements and concerns about new processors, thinness, or what the screen resolution is.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>While all these elements are important the most important things to concentrate on for the long-term success of tablets are pricing and distribution, both of which are discussed minimally at best.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;"> <span id="more-1197"></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;">Let’s start with distribution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The iPad has been lightly distributed for a product that sold around 12m units in the U.S. in 2010.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>As Apple talks more about small businesses and the iPad opportunity in enterprise it would be great if distribution focus was expanded to include more business-oriented channels like the office stores and the DMRs, such as PC Connection and Insight.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Those chains and resellers offer Apple real chances to gain incremental volume versus shoveling a couple more units through the carrier stores or adding another Web site.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Although, even in its consumer focus, Apple’s distribution clearly needs to expand into more regional CE outlets and test more alternative distribution opportunities like department and home stores, such as Kohl’s or Bed Bath and Beyond.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;">Distribution will be interesting, but pricing will be critical.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Every tier one PC, phone, and TV OEM will have tablets on the market by July.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>By my count that is probably something on the order of 20 SKUS from tier one brands with high consumer familiarity, and retail savvy with lots of retail partnerships.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>But there is no way there is room on the shelves of America’s retailers for that many tablets.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The fight for shelf space is therefore likely to be vicious as we head into back-to-school and the holiday season.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>And robust shelf space competition inevitably leads to one thing: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Price Wars</span>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;">With that in mind it will be interesting to see whether the new iPad comes with a new low price.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Since Apple tends to keep the same ASP for the life of a product, if Apple launches iPad 2 at the same prices as the original iPad is sold for today they will clearly be absorbing some risk that other, presumably high-quality, tier one branded product, could be selling lower at their launches at $299, or even lower prices during the holiday.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;">Since Apple never responds to that type of price activity the key to iPad 2’s announcement will be whether today’s price holds or Apple is the first one to shoot off a canon in a tablet price war.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>So forget about specs think price, think distribution, as those are always the attributes that make products, even Apple’s, successful not DRAM, GHz and mega pixels.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1197" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2011/03/what%e2%80%99s-really-important-in-apple%e2%80%99s-ipad-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMBs Looking To Upgrade</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/06/smbs-looking-to-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/06/smbs-looking-to-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Baker, Vice President, Industry Analysis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PC purchasing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reseller]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SMB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of months ago we talked about some distribution and reseller sales statistics which indicated that, at least as we exited 2009 sales growth had begun to pickup in the SMB focused channels that NPD tracks besides retail. As we are now through the first few months of 2010 we have seen this trend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of months ago we talked about some <a href="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/01/reseller-sales-close-out-the-optimism-trifecta/" target="_self">distribution and reseller sales </a>statistics which indicated that, at least as we exited 2009 sales growth had begun to pickup in the SMB focused channels that NPD tracks besides retail. As we are now through the first few months of 2010 we have seen this trend continue, in both our Distributor Track and our Commercial Reseller Tracking services. In both, revenue is tracking towards 2008 levels and showing substantial revenue growth over the depressed levels of 2009.<br />
<span id="more-1007"></span></p>
<p>To support these numbers we just released <a href="http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100615a.html" target="_self">a survey of SMB buyers </a>focused on companies under 1000 employees and found some optimism towards spending there, which is clearly borne out by the POS results. In the survey we dug a little bit deeper and tried to get at what SMBs intend to spend on in 2010 and whether this spending is above where they were in 2009. The results were extremely positive. More than 60 percent of those surveyed are intending to spend money in 2010 on PCs, networking equipment, and servers and 59 percent are planning to spend on storage equipment.</p>
<p>The main reason sited by companies for purchasing was to keep up with technology by upgrading their equipment. Almost 2/3 of purchase intentions were driven by the need to continue to upgrade their equipment. Certainly we have all been paying a lot of attention to the PC upgrade cycle in 2010 as the release of Windows 7 and the revived economy has helped spur interest in the upgrading clients.</p>
<p>Our survey found some interesting data in PC purchasing intentions. As we mentioned in the press release, PCs had the highest intention of being purchased in 2010 as well as the largest segment of companies planning to spend the same, or more, on PCs in 2010 as they did in 2009. Digging deeper we saw that PC upgrade intentions are very different by company size. Almost 80 percent of companies with more than 200 employees planned to spend on PCs as part of a long-term plan to upgrade equipment, a clear sign that Windows 7 is creating interest in larger firms. Conversely, only 65 percent of firms with less than 50 employees intended to upgrade for that reason. But 80 percent of firms of that size said they did intend to spend more, or the same, as last year. Among firms planning to spend less on PCs in 2010, 56 percent said they had replaced equipment last year and a whopping 75 percent of firms with under 50 employees said they replaced last year and would therefore be decreasing their spend this year. The bottom line then appears to be that sales will begin shifting to larger companies in the PC arena in 2010 as some portion of corporate budgets begin to be spent on new client systems.</p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1007" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/06/smbs-looking-to-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tunnels To The Television</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/04/tunnels-to-the-television/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/04/tunnels-to-the-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Rubin, Executive Director, NPD Connected Intelligence</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet-connected TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the DisplaySearch blog, my colleague Paul Gagnon examines the proposed Hulu subscription service and expresses concern that the service could be jeopardized by fearful cable stakeholders. Indeed, cable companies, such as Comcast, have likely been pressuring broadcasters such as NBC, which have in turn pressured Hulu to vigilantly block access to any device or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the DisplaySearch blog, my colleague <a href="http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2010/04/the-hulu-effect-on-tvs/#more-1203" target="_blank">Paul Gagnon </a>examines the proposed Hulu subscription service and expresses concern that the service could be jeopardized by fearful cable stakeholders. Indeed, cable companies, such as Comcast, have likely been pressuring broadcasters such as NBC, which have in turn pressured Hulu to vigilantly block access to any device or software that is designed to display content on the television, as arbitrary as this &#8220;line in the sand&#8221; may be. A recent example of this was Hillcrest Labs&#8217; Kylo TV browser that debuted at this year&#8217;s spring DEMO Conference, but which landed on its face because Hulu suddenly decided to block it.</p>
<p><span id="more-979"></span>Paul, therefore, has good precedent to suspect that cable companies will frown upon Hulu&#8217;s offerings. But there&#8217;s also at least one reason why they might not. Putting a price on the value of the Hulu service enables cable companies to position their own TV Everywhere services directly against Hulu. This is far more challenging to do against a free service consumed by people unwilling to pay for subscription TV regardless of how it is delivered.</p>
<p>Paul also notes that Internet-connected televisions (which could be easy targets for blocking unless manufacturers strike deals with Hulu) are growing in popularity, but so are other pathways to the TV. According to NPD&#8217;s Retail Tracking Service, networked content devices have seen strong growth since the beginning of the year. Some of this has been due to lower-priced networked music products from Sonos and Roku. But the most significant new entrant has been Netgear&#8217;s Push2TV WiDi receiver that works with the new video projection technology integrated into certain notebooks using Intel Core i3 and Core i5 processors. Dell, Toshiba, and Sony have been among the earliest to support WiDi, while Netgear has been the first out of the gate with a receiver that works with all these brands.</p>
<p>The lesson behind WiDi&#8217;s success is that consumers will go to the trouble of bridging the PC and television if you lower the technical and financial barriers to doing so, and it bodes well for future technologies that seek to simplify wireless HD video transmission such as WirelessHD and WHDI. Perhaps by the time those technologies are ready for the masses, Hulu &#8212; or whatever version of its service that meets with MSO approval &#8212; will offer great flexibility at a price that entices consumers.</p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=979" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/04/tunnels-to-the-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad Begins A New Chapter For e-Readers</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/02/ipad-begins-a-new-chapter-for-e-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/02/ipad-begins-a-new-chapter-for-e-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Rubin, Executive Director, NPD Connected Intelligence</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iBook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the open questions surrounding the iPad that has quickly come to the fore in light of the recent Amazon-Macmillan brinksmanship is to what extent the device will jeopardize sales of e-readers. This is particularly true of the market-leading Kindle, upon the metaphorical shoulders of which Steve Jobs said Apple stood.

Certainly, attributes of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the open questions surrounding the iPad that has quickly come to the fore in light of the recent Amazon-Macmillan brinksmanship is to what extent the device will jeopardize sales of e-readers. This is particularly true of the market-leading Kindle, upon the metaphorical shoulders of which Steve Jobs said Apple stood.</p>
<p><span id="more-913"></span></p>
<p>Certainly, attributes of the iPad held appeal for some e-reader owners. According to NPD’s recent report, <a href="http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100203b.html" target="_self"><em>e-Reader Owners: Attitudes and Usage</em></a>, about a quarter of e-reader owners expressed interest in having a touch screen in their next e-reader, and a third of e-reader owners said that they wanted a color screen in such a device. Apple platforms also featured prominently as alternative devices for e-reading, with the iPhone serving that role for nearly a fifth of e-reader owners aged 18 to 34.</p>
<p>However, e-reader owners overall seem to appreciate the fixed purpose and optimization of their device, with about 40 percent of e-reader owners saying they were looking for more battery life in their next e-reader whereas the iPad offers less than e-paper-based devices. Furthermore, the majority of e-reader owners said they had taken advantage of no supplementary functions, such as Internet access or playing back music, on their e-reader. (Yet, part of this could be attributable to these experiences being less engaging than they are on the iPad; Barnes &amp; Noble noted this when explaining its decision to exclude Web browsing functionality from its Nook.) Then there are the pricing differences, not just the $240 premium that the least expensive iPad holds versus the Kindle 2, but in Amazon’s subsidized wireless broadband that can be justified due to the limited and transaction-oriented nature of its 3G access.</p>
<p>The iBooks functionality of the iPad has received disproportionate attention because it is new, because it touches a growing category that attracted many new entrants at CES, because it addresses another device that has wedged itself into that narrow chasm between smartphone and notebook, and because it captures the optimism of a media that generates words.</p>
<p>While the iPad may signify the kind of device that represents much of the future of e-reading, it is something new. Rather than throwing cold water on the Kindle, the iBooks feature will ultimately compete far more for attention with the device’s other content-consumption features for those who see the value in a converged product.</p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=913" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/02/ipad-begins-a-new-chapter-for-e-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reseller Sales Close Out The Optimism Trifecta</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/01/reseller-sales-close-out-the-optimism-trifecta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/01/reseller-sales-close-out-the-optimism-trifecta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Baker, Vice President, Industry Analysis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DMR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reseller channel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPD today released some good news about sales to small and medium business through the reseller channel, what us old timers used to call the DMR (direct marketing reseller) channel. Sales in December were very strong, posting growth of 7 percent year-over-year, the first time this segment has shown positive growth in more than 15 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPD today released some good news about sales to <a href="http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100127.html" target="_self">small and medium business </a>through the reseller channel, what us old timers used to call the DMR (direct marketing reseller) channel. Sales in December were very strong, posting growth of 7 percent year-over-year, the first time this segment has shown positive growth in more than 15 months.</p>
<p><span id="more-896"></span><br />
Combined with strong point-of-sale data from NPDs Retail Tracking Service, where IT sales overall were up 14 percent and positive performance from NPD’s Distributor Tracking Service, where December sales were up nearly 16 percent, it does appear that sales are looking up across all the major customer segments heading into 2010. Of course, we do want to temper the improving results we have reported with the recognition that comparisons against the generational meltdown during the fourth quarter of 2008 are likely to be a bit flawed and that we do need to see these trends continue through the first quarter of2010 to be certain that these are not just false positives.</p>
<p>However, inside the reseller data we see a number of positive data trends that leave us with some level of optimism. Unlike consumer sales, reseller improvement was more broad-based and not just the result of the PC land rush we saw post-Windows 7. Sure both desktops and notebooks performed admirably, but unlike the consumer market where those two categories accounted for 50 percent of consumer spending in December the reseller channel is more diverse depending on PC clients for only about 16 percent of total volume in December. More exciting is the up-tick in average prices that are becoming more pronounced through this channel. With unit volume remaining tepid the gradual growth in ASPs we have seen leads one to believe that SMBs are buying core products that are essential to their business growth and are willing to spend on those as opposed to just general spending on IT products. A couple of examples will serve us well here. First is the server market, where we saw ASPs move to over $3000 in the fourth quarter. This is part of a trend that extends back into mid-2008 as we have seen share move into higher-priced servers (over $4000 products accounted for over 20 percent of sales volume) a strong indicator, when combined with the low levels of unit growth, that strategic buying of core hardware continues while less crucial purchases continue to be postponed. In networking devices we see evidence of this trend as well. While the fourth quarter always tends to deliver higher ASPs in 2009 wired network devices saw a 22 percent jump over third quarter selling prices, far ahead of the 2 percent increase we have seen in the fourth quarter of both 2008 and 2007. The net result was a nice revenue increase in December for wired network devices despite anemic unit volume growth, which has been traditionally the engine that drives revenue increases in IT.</p>
<p>All these measures put together while, we want to emphasize again, are at least partly the result of seasonality and the weak comparisons to 2009, ought to at least give the marketplace the confidence to expect better times ahead as we move into 2010.</p>
 <img src="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=896" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2010/01/reseller-sales-close-out-the-optimism-trifecta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

