<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First down and 32 inches to go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2009/02/first-down-and-32-inches-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2009/02/first-down-and-32-inches-to-go/</link>
	<description>The official blog of The NPD Group</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.npdgroupblog.com/2009/02/first-down-and-32-inches-to-go/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npdgroupblog.com/?p=429#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Nice to read this article. Regarding 32" volume share increase during superbowl season, I think the increase came more from low price of Samsung 32", $497, bestbuy and walmart, and basically end users hope to change their 2nd TV. Those things only explains why small size LCD TV 32" could be sold during superbowl season which was traditionally season for bigger size like 46/47", 42/40". thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to read this article. Regarding 32&#8243; volume share increase during superbowl season, I think the increase came more from low price of Samsung 32&#8243;, $497, bestbuy and walmart, and basically end users hope to change their 2nd TV. Those things only explains why small size LCD TV 32&#8243; could be sold during superbowl season which was traditionally season for bigger size like 46/47&#8243;, 42/40&#8243;. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

